Finger pushing


Manitou Springs ‘well-protected and well-served’ by flood mitigation efforts, officials say after storm

072418-news-floodaftermath

Days after heavy rain and hail pummeled the Pikes Peak region, Manitou Springs officials are touting the efficacy of flood-control projects installed in the wake of the devastating 2013 and 2015 floods.

More than $18 million has been spent in an effort to lessen the impact of the next disaster. The recovery and mitigation efforts were tested last Monday — and they worked, said Shelley Cobau, the city’s public services director.

Damage to city property from Monday’s storm will cost at least $1.5 million — about 15 percent of the city’s general fund budget — prompting Mayor Ken Jaray to declare a local disaster emergency. But the damage could have been far worse, officials say.

“If those debris nets weren’t in place (in Williams Canyon) and we ended up with all that woody debris and sediment, it would have been a similar event to 2013,” Cobau said Friday. “We didn’t get a lot of woody debris and muck down in the center of the city.

“Yeah, we had damage, but the overflow from that facility went across Soda Springs Park, which was what was designed to occur — so that the damage would be on municipal property from the overflow and not on private property.

GoFundMe page taking donations for volunteer Hanover firefighters injured in road collapse

“I would say it’s been very successful. I think the city’s been well-protected and well-served by the facilities that have been constructed in such a short time.”

By Thursday afternoon, crews had cleared 1,600 cubic yards of sediment and woody debris — about 100 large dump truck loads — from across the city, Cobau said. It’s unclear how much of that was taken from debris nets or other flood-control structures.

The debris are sitting on a lot near the Public Services Department building, creating a hilly landscape near where employees park their cars. The debris collected in the aftermath of the 2013 floods almost had been cleared off the property before last week’s storm hit, Cobau said.

The department’s 31 staff members worked 16-hour days all week to clean up what she called “a little bit of mud in a lot of places.”

The city’s three flood-control gates installed near Cañon and Park avenues, however, were problematic.

One failed entirely. A car reportedly was parked on another, preventing it from opening. The third partially popped up.

“We have some work to do on those gates,” Cobau said. “They’re not well signed. We need to get it striped so people know not to park on them. … We’ll get on that very quickly.”

Featured Local Savings

Nearly $800,000 was allocated to build flood walls and passive flood gates, according to data provided by Cobau. Engineers are working to fix the gates, she said. They also will alter the gates to allow them to be more easily triggered, even during smaller storm events.

Homeless camps hit by storm as Colorado Springs' creekside camping ban takes effect

Crews also have removed debris from the Waldo Canyon burn scar and re-vegetated the area, leaving less debris to wash through the city during a flood.

“It’s not just built facilities — it’s mitigating the upper watershed,” Cobau said. “All those efforts culminate so we can have a 500-year event go through Manitou Springs and we don’t have loss of life. We didn’t have interruption of business, road closures, catastrophic bridge failures, things like that.”

Some of the mitigation projects are still underway, Cobau said. But Williams Canyon phases I & II, which cost $6 million and include a flood-control channel, are complete.

The projects’ $18 million price tag is covered in part by about $16.1 million in grant funding and city insurance money, said Crystal Abeyta, the city’s grant administrator. The city has contributed $1.8 million, or a little more than 10 percent of the cost.

“The before and after is what everyone sees, but to get them here to there takes a lot of our team (doing) a lot of administrative work,” Abeyta said.

In February, the Manitou Springs City Council declined to pursue a fourth phase of Williams Canyon flood control projects, rejecting $1 million in federal funding, the Pikes Peak Bulletin reported. And some residents have expressed concerns about the flood mitigation projects.

Too much silt collects in the flood channel that comes out of Williams Canyon, a critical stretch of recharge for the mineral springs aquifer, which “chokes off the possibility of recharge water reaching the aquifer,” said Dave Wolverton, a Manitou Springs resident and board member of the Mineral Springs Foundation.

“The concern is the city doesn’t really have any protocols to clean those sections, and they don’t have any way to monitor the effectiveness of that recharge section,” said Wolverton, who was not speaking for the organization.


+44 

[inline_image src=”aHR0cHM6Ly9ibG94aW1hZ2VzLm5ld3lvcmsxLnZpcC50b3dubmV3cy5jb20vZ2F6ZXR0ZS5jb20vY29udGVudC90bmNtcy9hc3NldHMvdjMvZWRpdG9yaWFsLzIvMzQvMjM0YmQ5ODQtOGY3OC0xMWU4LWE2ZmMtNGZlYjMxMGMzNzE1LzViNTc3ZWEzMTkxNjUuaW1hZ2UuanBnP3Jlc2l6ZT0xMzk2JTJDNzc1″ alt=”U3Rvcm0gQWZ0ZXJtYXRoIDM=”]


+44 

Storm Aftermath 3


+44 

[inline_image src=”aHR0cHM6Ly9ibG94aW1hZ2VzLm5ld3lvcmsxLnZpcC50b3dubmV3cy5jb20vZ2F6ZXR0ZS5jb20vY29udGVudC90bmNtcy9hc3NldHMvdjMvZWRpdG9yaWFsL2QvZGQvZGRkZjZlZTItOGY3Ny0xMWU4LWEwMjgtNTMyOTk2MGZhODI0LzViNTc3ZTM4NGJjNGUuaW1hZ2UuanBnP3Jlc2l6ZT0xMzk2JTJDODk3″ alt=”U3Rvcm0gQWZ0ZXJtYXRoIDE=”]


+44 

Storm Aftermath 1


+44 

[inline_image src=”aHR0cHM6Ly9ibG94aW1hZ2VzLm5ld3lvcmsxLnZpcC50b3dubmV3cy5jb20vZ2F6ZXR0ZS5jb20vY29udGVudC90bmNtcy9hc3NldHMvdjMvZWRpdG9yaWFsL2YvZDEvZmQxOThlNWEtOGY3Ny0xMWU4LTliMjItODc5YmY3MTdhOTA4LzViNTc3ZTdiYTA0MGMuaW1hZ2UuanBnP3Jlc2l6ZT0xMzk2JTJDODcy” alt=”U3Rvcm0gQWZ0ZXJtYXRoIDI=”]


+44 

Storm Aftermath 2


+44 

[inline_image src=”aHR0cHM6Ly9ibG94aW1hZ2VzLm5ld3lvcmsxLnZpcC50b3dubmV3cy5jb20vZ2F6ZXR0ZS5jb20vY29udGVudC90bmNtcy9hc3NldHMvdjMvZWRpdG9yaWFsLzQvMWIvNDFiMzY3MTYtOGY3OC0xMWU4LTk3MDUtYjM0NzIyMDYwMzJlLzViNTc3ZWQ3NzU1MmMuaW1hZ2UuanBnP3Jlc2l6ZT0xMzk2JTJDOTMw” alt=”U3Rvcm0gQWZ0ZXJtYXRoIDQ=”]


+44 

Storm Aftermath 4


+44 

[inline_image src=”aHR0cHM6Ly9ibG94aW1hZ2VzLm5ld3lvcmsxLnZpcC50b3dubmV3cy5jb20vZ2F6ZXR0ZS5jb20vY29udGVudC90bmNtcy9hc3NldHMvdjMvZWRpdG9yaWFsLzUvYzgvNWM4YzU0NzYtOGY3OC0xMWU4LTgxN2MtOTcxMjExNTY4ODA5LzViNTc3ZWZlZGY1ZWUuaW1hZ2UuanBnP3Jlc2l6ZT0xMzk2JTJDMTA1Mg==” alt=”U3Rvcm0gQWZ0ZXJtYXRoIDY=”]


+44 

Storm Aftermath 6

Wolverton acknowledged that the mitigation projects have appeared to work, but said “the big concern is the maintenance factor.”

The Pikes Peak Bulletin reported that other residents worry about the how effective the infrastructure would be in the face of a catastrophic storm.



Welcome Back.

Streak: 9 days i

Stories you've missed since your last login:

Stories you've saved for later:

Recommended stories based on your interests:

Edit my interests